How I Reduced My Biological Age by 2 to 10.5 Years with Just 2 Minutes (and 12 Hours of Waiting)
Let's begin this article without an abstract or the usual tedious scientific formalities designed to pull the reader in.
During the night, between July 19 and July 20, 2026, I carried out a series of measurements of my body using the AgeScan device, manufactured in the Netherlands.
During the night, between July 19 and July 20, 2026, I carried out a series of measurements of my body using the AgeScan device, manufactured in the Netherlands.
I performed two sessions on my body. A session means applying my technology to myself or passing through my technology.
Approximately 12 hours later, I performed another series of measurements.
Approximately 12 hours later, I performed another series of measurements.
During the 12-hour waiting period for the results, the following happened:
- Sleep: less than 6 hours.
- No radiation devices, injections, or tablets were used.
- The time between the measurements was approximately 12 hours.
- The rejuvenation practice consisted of two 1-minute sessions before the first measurements.
- None of the methods or technologies commonly offered by modern science were used. The technology is based on entirely different principles.
- In the morning, a light exercise routine was performed, including 20 forward bends and 70 squats, followed by moderate, specially planned nutrition according to the established protocol.
- The sensations in my body were as if a tank had run over me, I had been beaten with sticks, and I had unloaded an entire freight car full of construction materials.
- At the same time, however, I experienced an exceptional sense of joy, happiness, confidence in tomorrow, strength, a constant smile, and nothing but positive emotions.
According to the cell glycation measurements, the biological age of the left hand became 2 years younger, while the right hand became 3 years younger.
The MyAge Index for the left hand improved by 10 points (24% below the average person's value, equivalent to approximately 9.1 years younger). The MyAge Index for the right hand improved by 11 points (28% below the average person's value, equivalent to approximately 10.64 years younger).
The skin of the left hand became 7 years younger, the skin of the right hand became 10 years younger, and the facial skin became 7 years younger.
I have now reached almost the lowest boundary of the range in which further reductions in my skin age appear possible, since my physical body has already stopped growing. The BodyAge glycation range will continue to be refined, and I will report future results in upcoming articles.
My current target for skin cell glycation age is 24 years. However, because I had previously and intentionally increased my body's biological age to the upper end of its range, a 12 hour period was not enough to reduce my glycation age by 10 years. Instead, the measured reduction was 3 years. It is also important to note that the entire intervention consisted of only two one minute sessions.
The MyAge Index for the left hand improved by 10 points (24% below the average person's value, equivalent to approximately 9.1 years younger). The MyAge Index for the right hand improved by 11 points (28% below the average person's value, equivalent to approximately 10.64 years younger).
The skin of the left hand became 7 years younger, the skin of the right hand became 10 years younger, and the facial skin became 7 years younger.
I have now reached almost the lowest boundary of the range in which further reductions in my skin age appear possible, since my physical body has already stopped growing. The BodyAge glycation range will continue to be refined, and I will report future results in upcoming articles.
My current target for skin cell glycation age is 24 years. However, because I had previously and intentionally increased my body's biological age to the upper end of its range, a 12 hour period was not enough to reduce my glycation age by 10 years. Instead, the measured reduction was 3 years. It is also important to note that the entire intervention consisted of only two one minute sessions.
Added on July 21, 2026
Twenty-four hours later, I performed another session on my body. Approximately 8 hours afterward, I conducted another series of biological age assessments, including measurements of head glycation (aging).
The biological age of the left side of my body decreased by an additional 2 years, reaching 30 years.
The biological age of my head, based on glycation measurements, also improved significantly:
Twenty-four hours later, I performed another session on my body. Approximately 8 hours afterward, I conducted another series of biological age assessments, including measurements of head glycation (aging).
The biological age of the left side of my body decreased by an additional 2 years, reaching 30 years.
- 34 years - two days earlier
- 32 years - one day earlier
- 30 years - current result
The biological age of my head, based on glycation measurements, also improved significantly:
- July 18, 2026: 33 years
- July 21, 2026: 28 years
According to my measurements, the highest biological age I was able to induce was 35 years on July 8, 2026.
As of today, glycation testing shows a biological age of 30 years for both sides of my body, while the biological age of my head measures 28 years.
As of today, glycation testing shows a biological age of 30 years for both sides of my body, while the biological age of my head measures 28 years.
One day later (on July 21, 2026), the biological age of my facial skin reached 10 years. At this point, this appears to be the lowest level I have been able to achieve.
Both my visceral biological age and the biological age of my facial skin are now measured at 10 years.
However, according to the body glycation assessment, my overall biological age still appears to require an additional 4-8 years of reduction to align with the other measurements.
I will provide further updates as additional testing and measurements become available.
I will provide further updates as additional testing and measurements become available.
A small life hack: In almost 100% of cases, biological age measurements have shown that the hand a person has used throughout their life for writing corresponds to the side of the body that appears slightly older than the opposite side.
The difference is usually less than 1%, but I consider this a normal variation because energy flows are more actively directed through that side.
For example, I write with my left hand, and measurements of the left side of my body show an age deviation of approximately 0.7% higher compared with the right side.
If I want both sides of my body to have the same biological age, I need to balance both sides more carefully. Once this balance is restored, the measurements return to normal.
The difference is usually less than 1%, but I consider this a normal variation because energy flows are more actively directed through that side.
For example, I write with my left hand, and measurements of the left side of my body show an age deviation of approximately 0.7% higher compared with the right side.
If I want both sides of my body to have the same biological age, I need to balance both sides more carefully. Once this balance is restored, the measurements return to normal.
R=↔=L | L=↔=R
In total, I have conducted hundreds of different biological age tests on myself. The most challenging part has been achieving changes in skin glycation measurements. Other indicators, such as PhenoAge, telomere length, DNA methylation, visceral biological age measurements, physical performance, strength tests, and reaction measurements, have already reached the desired level, with results showing an age range between 10 and 20 years.
The most challenging ≠ impossible.
It is absolutely understandable and achievable. This specific glycation indicator is simply the most demanding when it comes to working with the body.
I have already achieved the desired glycation parameters before. However, after artificially aging myself once again for the hundredth time, I want to demonstrate that it is possible and go through the process of reducing them again.
The most challenging ≠ impossible.
It is absolutely understandable and achievable. This specific glycation indicator is simply the most demanding when it comes to working with the body.
I have already achieved the desired glycation parameters before. However, after artificially aging myself once again for the hundredth time, I want to demonstrate that it is possible and go through the process of reducing them again.
Dear reader,
Thank you for taking the time to read my articles. However, I would like to add a small critique at the end of this article.
1. A scientist comes from the idea of learning, studying, and being taught. In other words, learning from one's past mistakes, taking new steps while excluding (or taking into account) previous mistakes. Such a person can be called a scientist. If, however, a scientist considers themselves a scientist simply because they follow the dogmas accepted by modern science, then, in my opinion, they act like parrots, repeating what they have memorized.
2. Elderly researchers around the world are searching for a cure for aging, creating injections and equipment to treat cancer or extend life. However, my website already presents enough information to suggest that the direction they are pursuing is a dead end, and that the only path leads to positive results is the one I describe throughout my articles. I have come to the impression that their goal is not to find the true Holy Grail, but rather to focus on questionable financial management and spending.
The points above are supported, in part, by the work presented in the paper "Growing Neural Cellular Automata" (DOI: 10.23915/distill.00023) and the accompanying publication on Distill: https://distill.pub/2020/growing-ca/. Fundamentally new neural networks based on ternary logic, rather than the conventional binary logic designed for NPCs living in a Hollywood illusion and consuming GMO cutlets with 1,500 different ingredients in a single patty.
🌀 Within the next 10 years, everything I have written on my website will, in my view, be demonstrated by researchers and innovators around the world. And then society will say, "That person was writing about this back in 2025." That is why I invite you to visit my donation page today.
🌀 Although many people are not yet ready to support the long-term vision of establishing an Institute of Eternal Youth, I would like to personally invite those who share this goal to help make it a reality through a donation.
🌀 By becoming a supporter, you will receive lifetime access to most of our technological tools while directly contributing to the creation of an Institute of Eternal Youth unlike anything that currently exists within our Solar System.
Copyright Notice
All original content published in this article is protected by copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, distributed, republished, or otherwise used in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Disclaimer
The information presented in this article is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease and should not be considered medical advice. Nothing in this article should replace consultation with a qualified physician or other licensed healthcare professional. Always seek professional medical guidance regarding any health condition, medical concern, or treatment decision.
July 21, 2026
Thank you for taking the time to read my articles. However, I would like to add a small critique at the end of this article.
1. A scientist comes from the idea of learning, studying, and being taught. In other words, learning from one's past mistakes, taking new steps while excluding (or taking into account) previous mistakes. Such a person can be called a scientist. If, however, a scientist considers themselves a scientist simply because they follow the dogmas accepted by modern science, then, in my opinion, they act like parrots, repeating what they have memorized.
2. Elderly researchers around the world are searching for a cure for aging, creating injections and equipment to treat cancer or extend life. However, my website already presents enough information to suggest that the direction they are pursuing is a dead end, and that the only path leads to positive results is the one I describe throughout my articles. I have come to the impression that their goal is not to find the true Holy Grail, but rather to focus on questionable financial management and spending.
The points above are supported, in part, by the work presented in the paper "Growing Neural Cellular Automata" (DOI: 10.23915/distill.00023) and the accompanying publication on Distill: https://distill.pub/2020/growing-ca/. Fundamentally new neural networks based on ternary logic, rather than the conventional binary logic designed for NPCs living in a Hollywood illusion and consuming GMO cutlets with 1,500 different ingredients in a single patty.
🌀 Within the next 10 years, everything I have written on my website will, in my view, be demonstrated by researchers and innovators around the world. And then society will say, "That person was writing about this back in 2025." That is why I invite you to visit my donation page today.
🌀 Although many people are not yet ready to support the long-term vision of establishing an Institute of Eternal Youth, I would like to personally invite those who share this goal to help make it a reality through a donation.
🌀 By becoming a supporter, you will receive lifetime access to most of our technological tools while directly contributing to the creation of an Institute of Eternal Youth unlike anything that currently exists within our Solar System.
Copyright Notice
All original content published in this article is protected by copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, distributed, republished, or otherwise used in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Disclaimer
The information presented in this article is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease and should not be considered medical advice. Nothing in this article should replace consultation with a qualified physician or other licensed healthcare professional. Always seek professional medical guidance regarding any health condition, medical concern, or treatment decision.
July 21, 2026
Free Energy Tips🌍
Manage cookies
Cookie Settings
Cookies necessary for the correct operation of the site are always enabled.
Other cookies are configurable.
Other cookies are configurable.